Ratio of Number of HR Positions to Staff Numbers
Based on my experience, the ratio of HR positions in an organization appears to vary from 1:50 to 1:250.
I suspect that the ratio varies based on the ORGANIZATION'S SCOPE, SIZE, COMPLEXITY, AND INDUSTRY.
There may also be other factors that influence the ratio including the NUMBER AND TYPE OF SERVICES PROVIDED by the HR department.
I also suspect that the use of TECHNOLOGY, the HR MODEL (centralized, decentralized, shared services, etc.), and the BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT could impact the ratio.
⇨ Notwithstanding the number of variables, what is a reasonable ratio for a full service HR Department?
|
|
Dr. Alan Williams Professor, Thailand
|
|
Ratio of Number of HR Positions to Staff Numbers Agree with the posts already made, however I believe there's another point that needs to be reinforced regularly with managers. The point that ALL MANAGERS HAVE HR RESPONSIBILITIES. The title "manager" in fact implies the responsibility to manage every factor involved in achieving agreed goals and strategies and that includes managing the staff in the departments/teams etc. In my several roles as a CEO I never allowed operational managers to say 'HR stuff is for the HR manager, not my responsibility.
A simple example, a team member is not achieving agreed individual goals. The local manager made the final decision which candidate to employ and should always be managing that employee, checking progress towards goals. I had managers who tried to insist that HR dept should be checking this. I never allowed this attitude, my comments was always 'you are the manager of a team which must achieve agreed goals and each team member has individual goals, you (manager) are on the spot all day everyday, it's part of your management work. If necessary the manager should review/reinforce the goals and set new review dates etc. If these are still not achieved now bring HR into the picture.
|
Comments by date▼